Friday, October 9, 2009

Oklahoma's Senator Inhofe or Israel's President Peres?

For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman.


Those were the words of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee. Pretty simple and clear. The American public decides who wins American Idol or Dancing with Disgraced Republicans but Alfred Nobel appointed a committee of scholars to decide the recipient of the Peace Prize. As a friend of mine likes to say, "It's their spoon so they get to stir."

This year they decided to base the award on words, not achievements. Words matter. The committee honored President Obama's willingness to to engage in dialogue and negotiations
"as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts."


World opinion matters. Of course the yokels and the haters believe our country should be the world enforcer because we are the biggest, strongest and richest. Lacking knowledge or understanding of world history they laugh at the idea that there is value in respectful listening and peace making. The truth is that we will not always be the biggest, the strongest or the richest country. Even if our empire were to last longer than the British Empire, (it won't) we would still need more open hands and fewer clenched fists because the world is more crowded and more connected than at any time in history.

So I am delighted that the Nobel Committee honored my country by selecting our President. I understand that it is a symbol given at the beginning of long journey. I also understand that the people who are angry or spiteful about the award care more about petty politics than about the values that make democracy possible.

Jim Inhofe, Rush Limbaugh, Hugo Chavez and Khaled Al-Batsh, a leader of the militant Islamic Jihad in Gaza stand together in disagreement about the award. President Shimon Peres of Israel and Desmond Tutu endorsed the announcement. I know which side I prefer.

3 comments:

Jim Meehan, MD said...

There is nothing like unbridled bias and unwavering dedication to ideology to justify a purely political decision. The selection was without substance or merit, thus diminishing the prize for all those that come after.

Jim Meehan, MD said...

If I told you that Omorosa, Bernie Madoff, and Leona Helmsley also support the committee's decision, would that make a difference? No. Because, name-dropping is not really a reasonable or logical means of supporting an opinion.

Jim Meehan, MD said...

What is your opinion on Obama's conduct in the military actions in Afghanistan? What do you think the Nobel committee thinks of their decision now?